MACS, effective genome size
1
0
Entering edit mode
7.4 years ago

Hello,

Could you please advise how to choose effective genome size as MACS (v.1.4.2) parameter for peak calling on Drosophila Melanogaster reads? dm2 (1.20e+08) or dm3 (1.52e+08)? Sorry if my question seems strange, I'm a newbie in bioinformatics.

ChIP-Seq MACS • 2.7k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
7.4 years ago

The answer is whichever of dm2 or dm3 you used for alignment (likely dm3, since dm2 is very old).

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you a lot! I haven't done alignment by myself, just got BAM files with input and treatment files (alignment was done with Bowtie2). Is it possible to restore this information? Or maybe bowtie2 uses only dm3?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Just compare the chromosome sizes in the header of the BAM files. Info for dm3 is here, and dm2 is here. It looks like the chromosome names may differ slightly as well.

Alternatively, just ask whomever performed the alignments.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I compared chromosome sizes, it is dm3 as you said. Thank you for your help!

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

As a remark if anyone stumbles over this: The effective genome size here refers to the part of the genome that is actually uniquely mappable with standard sequencing read length. There are regions in the genome that are repetitive and therefore not mappable with short reads. They would only accumulate multimappers which are typically excluded from analysis due to low reliability (low or 0 MAPQ score). Therefore they are excluded from the genome size calculation which is used for the Poisson statistics macs2 uses. Please check the original paper for details on that.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2518 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6