How to deal with cross-hybridizing Affymetrix (or other) probe sets?
2
0
Entering edit mode
9.6 years ago

Some probe sets on microarrays cross-hybridise (hybridise to several target genes). If all possible targets were included this could skew the analysis in the favour of the cross-hybridising targets, however if only one is selected (at random?) or if the probe sets are left out entirely you might miss something important.

Is there any general concensus on how to deal with this problem?

term-enrichment gene-ontology • 2.0k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
9.6 years ago
Ctanes ▴ 70

I would recommend using custom cdf files. They redefine the probe sets so that it's one to one mapping to the genes. I worked with Affymetrix arrays and use the cdf files here. They keep a very good update of their cdf files as new mRNA information is released.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

I had read about these recently actually, I think I will try them out. I hadn't noticed before that they supply both gene-centric and transcript-centric CDFs, that's nice.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
9.5 years ago

I asked the maintainer of the Cytoscape GO term enrichment plug-in ClueGO how they handle cross-hybridising Affy IDs (as you can input them directly): "For the moment, we allow several affy spots for one entrez id, but only one entrez id for one affy spot. In this last case, we display the gene with the lowest entrez id (oldest annotation)."

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1906 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6