Question: why location of binding sites are different while human sequence is the same?
1
gravatar for na.cna30
4.2 years ago by
na.cna300
na.cna300 wrote:

Hello:

I have a basic question:

why location of binding sites like enhancers are depended on cell line? considering that human map like HG19 is fixed in UCSC, but histone signals which represent location of binding sites are different according to cell lines?

thanks.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 4.0 years ago by Emily_Ensembl17k • written 4.2 years ago by na.cna300
3
gravatar for Emily_Ensembl
4.0 years ago by
Emily_Ensembl17k
EMBL-EBI
Emily_Ensembl17k wrote:

I suggest you read up on epigenetics and cell differentiation. Different cell types serve different functions, therefore need different genes to be expressed. To do this, epigenetic marks differ between the cell types, resulting in different binding of transcription factors. This will cause gross differences.

Smaller differences in sites will be caused by technique. We find TFBSs and locations of histone modifications by ChIP-Seq. Proteins are covalently linked to the DNA, the DNA is cut into small fragments at random, we pull out our histone mod/TF with an antibody, then we clean and sequence the DNA and map it onto the genome. Since the DNA cutting is random, this means that we could have quite long or short tails on our DNA, making the edges of our binding sites necessarily fuzzy. This means that two identical experiments looking at an identical TFBS will still have peaks that don't match exactly.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 4.0 years ago • written 4.0 years ago by Emily_Ensembl17k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 854 users visited in the last hour