Sorry for what may be a very elementary question. I've been using DAVID to analyze a bunch of Uniprot IDs, with what appears to be a decent amount of success. However, I've encountered an ... inconsistency in my readouts that confuses me.
My list contains 14 IDs, all of which seem to have been read without problems by the DAVID list manager. When I go to my annotation summary results, it says that 10 of 14 showed some sort of pathway relevance. Okay, cool, that makes sense.
But when I click, I see that 7 of 14 factors were not included in the analysis? And when I go through the pathways individually, I see that that's correct -- 7 appear, and 7 do not. So what happened to the other 3? Where does the 10 come from?
I'm very new to this type of analysis, and could use a little advice from the more experienced. Thank you!