Question: FASTA of an arbitrary genome: Is the first base the 5' end?
1
gravatar for Marvin
5.4 years ago by
Marvin170
Australia
Marvin170 wrote:

Hello fellows,

I know that it doesn't matter which one of the 2 strands you declare the reference. But it should matter whether you store the strand (whichever you have chosen) in 5' -> 3' or 3' -> 5 orientation in a fasta file. When I download a sequence, is there sort of a convention that the first base is always the 5' (or 3') end? When I have a read that overhangs at the beginning of the sequence in the fasta file, is it a correct to say "The read overhangs the 5' end" ?

3' fasta 5' • 5.0k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 5.4 years ago by Brian Bushnell17k • written 5.4 years ago by Marvin170
1
gravatar for Brian Bushnell
5.4 years ago by
Walnut Creek, USA
Brian Bushnell17k wrote:

Nucleotide fasta is always 5' to 3', as are all other formats.

The only exception I am aware of is Solid Colorspace, but it's not in nucleotide space, and has the interesting property that the reverse is the same as the reverse-complement, and as a result, it doesn't matter.  But it's notable because their chemistry includes an enzyme that reads 3' to 5' for read 2.

Even so, when the colorspace reads were translated to nucleotide space, they were always represented 5' to 3'.

ADD COMMENTlink written 5.4 years ago by Brian Bushnell17k

If I recall correctly that technology produced reads from the same strand - pointing the same direction, but still right orientation. So it may have read the same fragment backwards from the end but it reversed it during reporting it. It was simple to do that since another property of the color space was that colors in reverse decode to a reverse sequence.

ADD REPLYlink written 5.4 years ago by Istvan Albert ♦♦ 85k
0
gravatar for Matt Shirley
5.4 years ago by
Matt Shirley9.4k
Cambridge, MA
Matt Shirley9.4k wrote:

Depends on if you find the ATG codon at the beginning of a gene that is annotated on the + strand :). I'm not sure that there is a convention but it's surely more confusing to distribute sequences as 3' > 5' and so probably uncommon.

ADD COMMENTlink written 5.4 years ago by Matt Shirley9.4k
0
gravatar for Istvan Albert
5.4 years ago by
Istvan Albert ♦♦ 85k
University Park, USA
Istvan Albert ♦♦ 85k wrote:

This is an interesting question because my first answer is of course it is in 5' to 3' direction but then I don't know of a rule that requires this - other than pandemonium would break out otherwise.

ADD COMMENTlink written 5.4 years ago by Istvan Albert ♦♦ 85k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 2194 users visited in the last hour