Question: Signed vs unsigned network construction: wgcna issue!
0
gravatar for emanuela.molinari
5.6 years ago by
United States
emanuela.molinari0 wrote:

 

 

Dear all:

i am trying to run WGCNA on my rnaseq dataset (20 samples, 2 conditions 10 obs each). I had a batch effect corrected with edgeR.

When I try to apply the soft threshold on my dataset I run into the following dilemma: if I set the network type "unsigned" I obtain a soft threshold of 15. If I rather make it "signed" then even after a power of 30 it doesn't get a scale free topology index of 0.9.

My knowledge in statistics is limited, and I cannot understand the reasons for such a weird behavior.

Can anyone help?

Thanks!!!

Manu

 

 

 

rna-seq network analysis wgcna • 4.2k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 5.5 years ago by Brian Gudenas90 • written 5.6 years ago by emanuela.molinari0
0
gravatar for Brian Gudenas
5.5 years ago by
United States
Brian Gudenas90 wrote:

A scale free topology index of 0.9 or greater is not required for WGCNA, although it should probably be above 0.8

Just take a look at the R code  from this publication (authored by the creator of WGCNA), they use a soft threshold of 26 (signed network) which only achieves an index of  0.808.

http://labs.genetics.ucla.edu/horvath/htdocs/CoexpressionNetwork/developingcortex/

It sounds like the issue is in the connectivity of your RNA-seq data though, is it being filtering by some criteria such as differential expression?

ADD COMMENTlink modified 5.5 years ago • written 5.5 years ago by Brian Gudenas90
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1119 users visited in the last hour
_