Question: SMRT analysis- what is difference between RS_HGAP_Assembly.2 vs RS_HGAP_Assembly.3
0
gravatar for mschmid
3.8 years ago by
mschmid90
Switzerland
mschmid90 wrote:

The title says it all: What is the difference between RS_HGAP_Assembly.2 and RS_HGAP_Assembly.3 in SMRT analysis 2.3.0?

I know that RS_HGAP_Assembly.3 is FASTER and RS_HGAP_Assembly.2 is supposed to have higher quality. But what where is the difference?

And what about the settings? So far we used RS_HGAP_Assembly.3. Can we use the same settings for RS_HGAP_Assembly.2 (for the settings which exist in both protocolls)?

Did you use both so far? Did you see big differences? If yes, what kind of differences?

pacbio assembly • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 5 weeks ago by Biostar ♦♦ 20 • written 3.8 years ago by mschmid90
1
gravatar for genomax
3.8 years ago by
genomax71k
United States
genomax71k wrote:

Comparison of HGAP protocols: https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/Bioinformatics-Training/wiki/HGAP-in-SMRT-Analysis

ADD COMMENTlink written 3.8 years ago by genomax71k

Thanks! Do you already have experience how the two assembly modules differ? For RS_HGAP_Assembly.3 I always find quite some single nucleotide indel errors. How is it for RS_HGAP_Assembly.2?

ADD REPLYlink written 3.8 years ago by mschmid90
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1561 users visited in the last hour