Plink prune.in prune.out blank
1
0
Entering edit mode
8.3 years ago
jt358 ▴ 10

Hi all,

Can anyone offer any advise as to why the prune.in and prune.out files from plink are both empty (info below)?

Many thanks if you can help at all

#./plink --noweb --allow-no-sex --batch_1.plink.ped –-indep 50 5 2

Skipping web check... [ --noweb ]

Writing this text to log file [ plink.log ]

Options in effect:

--noweb

--allow-no-sex

--file batch_1.plink

--indep 50 5 2

2665 (of 2665) markers to be included from [ batch_1.plink.map ]

Warning, found 24 individuals with ambiguous sex codes

Writing list of these individuals to [ plink.nosex ]

24 individuals read from [ batch_1.plink.ped ]

0 individuals with nonmissing phenotypes

Assuming a disease phenotype (1=unaff, 2=aff, 0=miss)

Missing phenotype value is also -9

0 cases, 0 controls and 24 missing

0 males, 0 females, and 24 of unspecified sex

Before frequency and genotyping pruning, there are 2665 SNPs

24 founders and 0 non-founders found

Total genotyping rate in remaining individuals is 0.950813

0 SNPs failed missingness test ( GENO > 1 )

0 SNPs failed frequency test ( MAF < 0 )

After frequency and genotyping pruning, there are 2665 SNPs

After filtering, 0 cases, 0 controls and 24 missing

After filtering, 0 males, 0 females, and 24 of unspecified sex

Performing LD-based pruning...

Writing pruned-in SNPs to [ plink.prune.in ]

Writing pruned-out SNPs to [ plink.prune.out ]

Scanning from chromosome 0 to 0

Skippng chromosome 0

SNP • 4.1k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
8.3 years ago

Variants with a chromosome code of 0 are considered to be unplaced, and are ignored by --indep{-pairwise}.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1899 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6