Question: Cancer causing variants: Fit or unfit?
gravatar for MAPK
3.0 years ago by
United States
MAPK1.4k wrote:

I am confused with the concept of fittest genetic variants particularly in the case of cancer genome. If the variants that allow cancer cells to respond and grow well in the tumour micro-environment, do we not call them fit variants? They are fit because they allow cancer cells to survive, but are unfit because those cells are not fit for the host itself. Can someone please clarify this conundrum?

genetic variants • 589 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.0 years ago by Chris Miller20k • written 3.0 years ago by MAPK1.4k
gravatar for Michael Dondrup
3.0 years ago by
Bergen, Norway
Michael Dondrup46k wrote:

I think that depends on the point of view. If you take the view of the cancer cells it might seem that they are more fit to survive inside the whole organism. However, cancer cells don't procreate, thereby their mutated genotype is unable to pass on to next generation anyway, and therefore they do not have a fitness in their own right. If they in effect kill their organism, the metazoan organism will be less fit to pass on its genotype to the next generation.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.0 years ago • written 3.0 years ago by Michael Dondrup46k
gravatar for Chris Miller
3.0 years ago by
Chris Miller20k
Washington University in St. Louis, MO
Chris Miller20k wrote:

Yes, Michael makes the key distinction here, between fitness of the organism and the fitness of a particular cancer cell. If a cell survives better and has more progeny than other cells in the tumor, then it has increased fitness, in terms of the cancer. In traditional evolutionary biology terms, though, if a cancer susceptibility allele does not affect the organism's reproductive potential, then it has no affect on fitness.

BRCA2 mutations predispose people to cancer, but that cancer doesn't typically kick in until later in life, often post-menopause. So even though it shortens the lifespan of the individual, it doesn't have much effect on reproductive fitness, which is why it persists in the population.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.0 years ago • written 3.0 years ago by Chris Miller20k
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1799 users visited in the last hour