How to phase a WGS dataset preserving the indels within it?

Question: How to phase a WGS dataset preserving the indels within it?

2.8 years ago by

Shab86 • 240

Helsinki

Shab86 • 240 wrote:

Hi all,

I have a WGS dataset in which indels were also called. Now I am looking towards creating this a reference dataset for the local population I am working on. But before using this as a reference set for imputation of Exome data for samples from this population, I would need to phase this WGS dataset.

The problem is that SHAPEIT and MACh can't handle indels within the files and usually have to be removed before phasing. My query is how do I phase the WGS dataset but also preserving the indels within it.

Any help is greatly appreciated!

sequencing phasing snp indel genome • 1.1k views

ADD COMMENT • link •

modified 2.8 years ago by piet • 1.6k • written 2.8 years ago by Shab86 • 240

2.8 years ago by

piet • 1.6k

planet earth

piet • 1.6k wrote:

Insertions and deletions is a concept, which only matters, if you compare two sequences. Technically, you cannot have indels within a single sequence string. You may have an annotation on a sequence which tells you that a particular region is an insertion (eg not present in other sequences from the same species).

You may refer to having gaps in your sequence. Gaps are usually written as '-'. You should squeeze them out, if an application does not allow them. For example, it is forbidden to submit sequences with gaps to Genbank.

ADD COMMENT • link modified 2.8 years ago • written 2.8 years ago by piet • 1.6k

Thanks for your reply. But if I do remove them then how would I be able to impute them in my genotyped samples? This way I would loose the indels which were called specifically earlier. And also, since I wouldn't be able to impute them in my samples then I can't use it for any downstream analysis also.

ADD REPLY • link written 2.8 years ago by Shab86 • 240

Nucleic acid molecules do not comprise any gap residues. Thus a sequence representing a real molecule must not have gaps. Make a copy of your gapped sequence before you delete the gaps.

ADD REPLY • link written 2.8 years ago by piet • 1.6k

Piet, I assume that your explanation doesn't concern diploid organisms? Because for phasing, you are effectively comparing two sequences, both alleles. It's a bit annoying indeed that you have to remove indels for phasing, but I understand it's an additional complexity the makers of the tool would like to avoid. What I would consider (and which is a bad workaround, which will likely come around and hurt you unexpectedly) is to substitute all indel variants for an artificial SNP variant. You keep the position on which you did this nasty trick and replace the real indels afterwards. Not sure on what your phasing algorithm is based. Doesn't hurt to try? It might just screw up everything but in that case we're smarter next time a similar problem arises.

ADD REPLY • link written 2.8 years ago by WouterDeCoster ♦ 37k

That's an idea WouterDeCoster ! I know it will mess up with the phasing algorithm of shapeit2 in regards to haplotype estimation maybe. I will try this and see if I get something meaningful when I phase them. But it's strange that shapeit2 refuses to take indels even now when even the latest 1kg ref dataset has indels in them.

ADD REPLY • link written 2.8 years ago by Shab86 • 240

Similar posts • Search »