Groomer function strictly necessary for all NGS jobs?
1
0
Entering edit mode
7.8 years ago
blewettn • 0

I am wondering if the Groomer tool is a strictly necessary step after BCL to FASTQ conversion with an Illumina Nextseq500 output, or if it is used for converting sequencing files from less-utilized platforms? I'm building my workflow and don't want to use unnecessary resources.

RNA-Seq • 1.5k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
7.8 years ago
GenoMax 141k

If you are asking in the context of galaxy then perhaps it may only be essential to identify a dataset as sanger fastq format (phred+33) (though I thought one could edit that information directly using the pencil icon and choosing the dataset format as fastqsanger, sorry I have not used galaxy recently).

Edit: This page indicates other functions that fastq groomer may be doing in Galaxy.

Data generated by illumina sequencers for the past 3+ years has been in sanger fastq format and as such does not require "grooming" (outside of galaxy).

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks very much for your detailed response!

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2434 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6