Question: reduced quality of lane 4 compared to other lanes (paired-end Illumina)
gravatar for rosies
3.9 years ago by
rosies0 wrote:

Hi there,

I have paired end Illumina (NextSeq) data (Staph aureus, avg sequence length 150bp). After running FastQC, I found reads from Lane 4 R2 to have reduced quality compared to that in Lane 1-3, R1 and R2. With most Lane 4, R2 from my samples (100+ samples) I would need to trim 30 bps whereas I wouldn't need to trim more than 5 bps from the other lanes. Should I just discard the data from this lane? or trim the reads from Lane 4 R2 (and some R1) separately before concatenating the forward (and reverse).

Thank you.

sequencing • 993 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.9 years ago • written 3.9 years ago by rosies0

Hi rosies,

did you multiplex your samples ? I mean, in the lane4, what do you have ? Only one sample ? One condition ? Or all conditions multiplexed as in lanes 1-3?

Theses details will help us to answer you better. :)

ADD REPLYlink modified 3.9 years ago • written 3.9 years ago by glihm620
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1724 users visited in the last hour