Only phiX reads in my data
2
0
Entering edit mode
7.5 years ago
Picoskia • 0

Hi,

When i'm aligning my sequence data to my reference genome, i'm getting only a very small fraction of reads (less than 1%). I have checked a lot the data, and found that 99% of my sequences are corresponding to phiX genome.

What does it mean? Did my run went wrong?

Thanks.

genome sequencing alignment • 3.1k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Did you not do any QC on the prepped libraries? Like @Devon said below either your libraries failed or there was some other issue (if the library had passed QC).

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

unfortunately no......

ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode

A Qubit and a Bioanalyzer are your friends :)

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode
7.5 years ago

Sounds like your library prep failed, so you ended up with all spike-in.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

thank you for your answer, i should try to make a new library....

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
7.5 years ago

You'll also see this result with high-quality libraries that have non-standard adapters (such as those requiring custom sequencing primers).

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks a lot, yes i have prepared a custom library with specific primers. Do you have any clue about why my reads are not mapping to my reference genome in this case?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

If the sequencing center did not include your custom primers during the sequencing then the sequencing (of your sample) did not work (your sequence provider should repeat the sequencing at no cost to you, IF you had told them that you need a custom sequencing primer when you submitted the sample, otherwise you would need to pay to repeat).

Non-phiX reads that you have are probably sequencing artifacts and thus won't map to your reference.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

i have give them the sequencing primers maybe my library went wrong

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

Can you ask them and confirm that custom primers were indeed used during run? It is not uncommon to forget this type of a thing since it is not required for "normal" runs.

If they did use the primer then the suspicion would shift back to bad libraries (provided your custom primers have been used before and proven to be good for other samples).

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2494 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6