RNA-Seq analysis with standard p-value
0
0
Entering edit mode
7.2 years ago
#### ▴ 220

I have analyzed RNA-Seq data using standard thresholds of logFC 2 and p-vlaue 0,05 using Deseq2 package. I am expecting one particular candidate gene which I have found from qPCR. In RNA-Seq resutls when I look for that gene logFC is 4 and padjval is 0,00. I am not able to understand why so ?

RNA-Seq • 2.6k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

I think why you are confused is because you do not see the (-) sign at your padjval column. That (-) sign you are not seeing is there to show you 10's power. so when its -5, it is 10^-5, which is a small number between 1 and 0. when padj is 0, it is the highest significance value that you can get, so there is no confusion in your results. spend a bit more time on understanding and interpreting results rather than simply filtering them.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

The adjusted p-value column isn't log10 transformed...

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

What's unexpected about that finding? padjval indicates very significant, logFC is reasonably big.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

In simple way..as p-value is 0 its not in my candidate gene list because of which I have to exclude it. Were as I expect it to be in the candidate gene list. So, I am trying to find out reason/s of p-value being 0.Yes logFC is higher.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

Pvalue = 0 means too significant to represent by a tiny number. So it's very significant. And smaller than 0.05. So it's differentially expressed. Why would you exclude it then?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

What p-value threshold are you using where 0 is not less than it?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Using p-value 0.05. I didnt get you what you mean?

ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode

So

0 < 0.05 => TRUE

therefore this gene is significant and should not be excluded

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks all for the reply I understand p=0 is highly significant.

now another case of gene where there is no p-value at all, not even zero , what does this says?

ADD REPLY
3
Entering edit mode

There are a couple reasons that one can get an NA adjusted p-value in DESeq2, the most common of which is due to independent filtering. I will quote from help(results):

On p-values:

By default, independent filtering is performed to select a set of genes for multiple test correction which maximizes the number of adjusted p-values less than a given critical value alpha (by de-fault 0.1). See the reference in this man page for details on independent filtering. The filter used for maximizing the number of rejections is the mean of normalized counts for all samples in the dataset. Several arguments from the filtered_p function of the genefilter package (used within the results function) are provided here to control the independent filtering behavior. In DESeq2 version >= 1.10, the threshold that is chosen is the lowest quantile of the filter for which the number of rejections is close to the peak of a curve fit to the number of rejections over the filter quantiles. ’Close to’ is defined as within 1 residual standard deviation. The adjusted p-values for the genes which do not pass the filter threshold are set to NA.

By default, results assigns a p-value of NA to genes containing count outliers, as identified using Cook’s distance. See the cooksCutoff argument for control of this behavior. Cook’s distances for each sample are accessible as a matrix "cooks" stored in the assays() list. This measure is useful for identifying rows where the observed counts might not fit to a Negative Binomial distribution.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for this information Devon , I have exactly followed the same thing from Deseq2 vignette and have disable the independent filtering and cooksCutoff both to avoid default filtering of such candidate genes and it worked fine.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

What do you mean by 'no p-value at all'. There must be some value like 'NA' or ''NaN' ...

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Hello ####!

We believe that this post does not fit the main topic of this site.

solved

For this reason we have closed your question. This allows us to keep the site focused on the topics that the community can help with.

If you disagree please tell us why in a reply below, we'll be happy to talk about it.

Cheers!

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

There's no need to close your own questions.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 3131 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6