I recently switched from tophat+mm9 to STAR+mm10. I used pair end reads and default parameters for both cases. However I noticed that the percentage of uniquely mapped reads decreased significantly. Earlier mapping for different samples were around 80-90,; now decreased to 50-70%. Has anybody had similar experience? What could be possible reasons?
Question: Different mapping rate for tophat+mm9 vs star+mm10
2.5 years ago by
Ice P • 0
Ice P • 0 wrote:
ADD COMMENT • link •
Please log in to add an answer.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 2622 users visited in the last hour