Question: Pooling fastq reads from different samples in metabarcoding
gravatar for lvogel
12 months ago by
Western Europe
lvogel20 wrote:

Hi, I've read that it is possible to pool all fastq files of Illumina reads, of different samples for metabarcoding, into one file, and then continue with analysis. I've even heard that you can combine reads from other runs, if they are from the same environment. Now, I would think that if you are going to combine samples from different runs, they should also be from the same sequencing depth, or the relative abundance estimations of biological sequences will be all wrong. Could anyone comment? Thanks.

illumina metabarcoding • 398 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 12 months ago by Pierre Lindenbaum105k • written 12 months ago by lvogel20
gravatar for Pierre Lindenbaum
12 months ago by
France/Nantes/Institut du Thorax - INSERM UMR1087
Pierre Lindenbaum105k wrote:

if you plan to mark the duplicates , reads from different flowcell/lane/library cannot be considered as an optical/pcr duplicate So you'll have to assign a distinct read-group for each of those conditions. Furthermore, tools like BWA use a subset of reads to calculate the average segment length.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 12 months ago • written 12 months ago by Pierre Lindenbaum105k
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1818 users visited in the last hour