Raw expression data is better for FPKM normalised expression profile in RNA seq
3
1
Entering edit mode
7.0 years ago
enterid ▴ 10

I am working on the Differential Expression Analysis on RNA-Seq Data between tumor sample and normal sample, while my lecturer suggest me better use the raw expression data instead of using FPKM as expression unit , anyone could tell me why ? or what is the advantage for this ?

RNA-Seq • 1.9k views
ADD COMMENT
3
Entering edit mode
7.0 years ago

If you want further details, you can visit Joshua Starmer youtube collection of videos

In this one, you can see details about how DESeq2 normalize RNA-Seq data from raw data

And in this one, how does it edgeR

ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode
7.0 years ago
Asaf 10k

In a nutshell, because you'll be able to apply statistical models to your values. When you normalize to FPKM you lose your ability to do so and end up with less robust statistical tests

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

alright , thank you

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

If an answer was helpful you should upvote it. If the answer resolved your question too, you should mark it as accepted.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode
6.1 years ago

The short answer is...the statisticians who wrote the software to do differential expression analysis have thought a lot about how best to normalize, and you should just let them do it. Those softwares all want raw counts as input so they can normalize, you should give them that, and let them do their thing. If you know what you are doing, and have compelling reasons to apply a different normalization function, the softwares have ways to allow you to do that, but a simple FPKM method is not going to be better than what the authors of the software have worked out.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1842 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6