Question: Standard fold enrichment cut-off/threshold in functional enrichment analysis?
0
gravatar for jjust8200
19 months ago by
jjust82000
jjust82000 wrote:

I am analyzing a set of DE miRNAs for functional enrichment. I have carried out miRNA target prediction using different algorithms and experimental databases. However, when testing for enrichment in “biological pathways” I get approx. 250 pathways significantly enriched (BH FDR corrected p-value). I recognize that because of the nature of the statistics used, pathways with many genes involved are more easily recognized as significant. Some of the most significant pathways, based on p-value, only have a fold enrichment of 1.4. Is there a standard or biologically meaningful “fold enrichment” cut-off/threshold that is normally implemented in these analysis’?

Thanks in advance

Standard fold enrichment cut-off/threshold in functional enrichment analysis?. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Standard_fold_enrichment_cut-off_threshold_in_functional_enrichment_analysis [accessed Apr 18, 2017].

ADD COMMENTlink written 19 months ago by jjust82000
1

Which methods did you use? Did you see this and this papers?

ADD REPLYlink modified 19 months ago • written 19 months ago by h.mon21k

Dear h.mon,

Thank you very much. Those papers are very useful! I will test my data with both algorithms.

I have used the standard hypergeometric distribution to test for enrichment with BH FDR correction of the p-values. I have annotated target genes to both GO, KEGG and REACTOME.

….. however, if the standard enrichment method is used, how would you sort the output – by adjusted p-value or fold enrichment? (of course only including significant KEGG og GO terms).

ADD REPLYlink written 19 months ago by jjust82000
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 715 users visited in the last hour