Question: bam-readcount values are higher than Mutect results
gravatar for sey
12 months ago by
sey0 wrote:

I use Mutect to find somatic mutations in multiple tumor samples (to be used in clonality analysis). I don't get the readcounts if the caller did not identify a somatic mutation in a sample. I'm using bam-readcount to fill in the empty values after merging Mutect results from different samples. Where I have values from both tools, the readcounts are lower in the Mutect results. Is there a way to use bam-readcount in a way to substitute for missing Mutect values?

bam-readcount • 389 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 12 months ago by Chris Miller19k • written 12 months ago by sey0
gravatar for Chris Miller
12 months ago by
Chris Miller19k
Washington University in St. Louis, MO
Chris Miller19k wrote:

Many callers do some filtering of reads first (by base quality, by mapping quality, maybe even local realignment) and report only counts from reads that pass. bam-readcount, by default, outputs "raw" counts. You may or may not be able to mimic those Mutect settings with bam-readcount parameters.

This problem is compounded when merging the output from different variant callers, and there is no "perfect" solution.

ADD COMMENTlink written 12 months ago by Chris Miller19k
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1779 users visited in the last hour