Question: DEXSeq batch effects issue
0
gravatar for ag1194
21 months ago by
ag11940
ag11940 wrote:

Hi I have a question about DEXSeq batch effect design. I followed the protocol from DEXSeq guideline to count in the batch effect.

featureID <- as.factor(data $featureID)  
groupID <- as.factor(data $gene_symbol)
design <- formula( ~ sample + exon + condition:exon )
formulaFullModel = ~ sample + exon + type:exon + condition:exon
formulaReducedModel = ~ sample + exon + type:exon
sampleTable = data.frame(row.names = c(paste0("num_",sample_3[1]),paste0("num_",sample_3[1+1]), paste0("num_",sample_6[1]),paste0("num_",sample_6[1+1])), condition = c("Control","Control", "Treatment","Treatment"), type = c("S","M"))

dxseq = DEXSeqDataSet(data1, sampleTable, design, featureID, groupID)
dxseq = estimateSizeFactors(dxseq)
dxseq = estimateDispersions(dxseq, formula= formulaFullModel)
dxseq = testForDEU(dxseq, reducedModel = formulaReducedModel, fullModel = formulaFullModel )
dxseq = DEXSeqResults(dxseq)

I also did DEXSeq without counting the batch effect. Without batch effect I've got more number of significantly regulated isoform than with batch effect design. According to their guideline, I suppose to observe more significant cases with the code above. I tried this method with different dataset and I always has less significant cases with the batch effect formula.

Looking forward to hear any explanation to understand the reason.

Thanks! -A

rna-seq dexseq • 537 views
ADD COMMENTlink written 21 months ago by ag11940
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 981 users visited in the last hour