Why ExAC used bwa aln instead of mem?
0
3
Entering edit mode
4.3 years ago
abascalfederico ★ 1.2k

Anyone knows why in ExAC they used bwa aln instead of mem? I am not sure of the read lengths but somewhere said something about 150 bps x 2. Does it make sense to use bwa aln here? I though for long reads mem was the best choice

The actual parameters used in ExAC were:

bwa aln q 5 -l 32 -k 2  -o 1 ...
bwa sampe -T -P ...
exac bwa • 1.3k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

If you can cite your source for this, that'd be great. I'm sure Daniel MacArthur's team would be glad to answer your question by the way - you could just send them an email!

EDIT: Found the source: https://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/nature/journal/v536/n7616/extref/nature19057-s1.pdf (supplementary in the paper

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I'll send them an email, thanks for the suggestion. Regarding the use of bwa aln, I found it in the supplementary material of: Lek, M., Karczewski, K. J., Minikel, E. V., Samocha, K. E., Banks, E., Fennell, T., ... & Tukiainen, T. (2016). Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature, 536(7616), 285-291.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1113 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6