Question: Low Alignment Rate for TT2 Cells
0
gravatar for angelo.hoi.chung.chan
21 months ago by
angelo.hoi.chung.chan0 wrote:

I've aligned several different sets of data for TT2 cells, including ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq and HiC data.

I use bowtie2 as my alignment tool. The data is paired-end reads. The paramters I've used range from default parameters, to "t -q -N 1 -L 25 -X 2000 --no-mixed --no-discordant --no-unal" and more. The reference genomes I used included both mm9 and mm10.

One thing I've noticed is that the alignment rate for TT2 cells is always very low compared to the other cell lines (2-3, J1, DnmtTKO, G7, etc), even when all samples are run on the same lanes on the same flow cell.

Other cell lines typically clock alignment rates of 95%-99% while TT2 alignment rates are usually 50-70%. This holds true across multiple benchwork experiments and dozens of data processing runs.

.

I know this is more of a cell lines question than a bioinformatics question, but has anyone else come across this phenomenon or worked with TT2 cells and noticed some peculiarities?

ADD COMMENTlink written 21 months ago by angelo.hoi.chung.chan0

The bowtie-index is the same for all the different cell lines experiments? Did you manually blast some of the unmapped reads, maybe a contamination in the TT2 stock?

ADD REPLYlink modified 21 months ago • written 21 months ago by ATpoint16k

Most samples have been run on both indexes. All samples from the same batch are aligned to the same index(es). I shall BLAST some of the unmapped reads as you suggested. Thank you for the idea. I will update this thread with my results.

ADD REPLYlink written 21 months ago by angelo.hoi.chung.chan0

Turns out it was a Mycoplasma contamination.

ADD REPLYlink modified 20 months ago • written 21 months ago by angelo.hoi.chung.chan0
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1629 users visited in the last hour