Question: Are all antisense transcripts from polyA enriched library RNA-seq polyadenylated?
gravatar for Alexie Li
2.8 years ago by
Alexie Li20
Alexie Li20 wrote:

Dear all, I have a confusion about antisense detection. From my RNA-seq result which is strand-specific and polyA enriched during library preparation, about one-third of genes showed antisense expression. Does it mean all the antisenses detected here have polyA tails/polyadenylated?

Thank you for your time!

ADD COMMENTlink modified 2.8 years ago by chalchiuhticuenaabah0 • written 2.8 years ago by Alexie Li20

Quite a few antisense transcripts are known to get polyadenylated so it is not very unusual. You can check if all the antisense transcripts you observe in your dataset are polyadenylated or not by doing further experiments.

ADD REPLYlink written 2.8 years ago by Satyajeet Khare1.5k
gravatar for Phil Ewels
2.8 years ago by
Phil Ewels560
Sweden / Stockholm / SciLifeLab
Phil Ewels560 wrote:

One possible explanation for this is a poor efficiency of the poly-A enrichment, possibly combined with DNA contamination. No enrichment is ever 100% efficient, so other material can always get into the library. If you have antisense reads in exons, this can sometimes be due to DNA contamination. This is fairly easy to check - have a look at how many reads are aligning between genes. Also, I guess whether this is a worry or not depends on how _much_ antisense expression those genes showed ;)

See this QCFail article for more information on DNA contamination in RNA-seq libraries.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 2.8 years ago • written 2.8 years ago by Phil Ewels560
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1162 users visited in the last hour