very-sensitive-local bowtie2 or bwa_mem
0
0
Entering edit mode
6.6 years ago
Illusion • 0

I'm now analysising targeted sequencing pair-end reads (approximately 100M per sample) to find edit pattern of crispr.

But how to do mapping and alignment? bowtie2 --very-sensitive-local (or -D 20 -R 3 -N 1 -L 20 -i S,1,0.50)or bwa-mem? which should be chosen as mapping tool.

Pro.Isvart say that bwa-mem is usually better than bowtie2(default). but when it comes to bowtie2 -D 20 -R 3 -N 1 -L 20 -i S,1,0.50. so question 1, what is the difference therotically?

I apply the two tools to my sample reads. the mapped reads number are nearly the same. but many reads in bwa sam files are secondary alignment (with FLAG 512)and some of them are not mapped in proper pairs(without FLAG 2),thus bwa may give less edited patterns.

so question 2, when a read is secondary alignment , does it appear more than once in sam file? question 3, if reads pair (read1 and read2) are not mapped in proper pairs, can these reads be used to count the pattern? question 4, can these flag make bwa more strict? Is bowtie2 results reliable?

alignment next-gen sequencing • 3.6k views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1532 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6