Question: which option is better for DESeq2 analysis: salmon or htseq-count?
0
gravatar for Lila M
3.3 years ago by
Lila M 870
UK
Lila M 870 wrote:

Hi everybody!

I have a question and I need your opinion! To carry out RNA-seq analysis, I'm working with htseq-count (python) for a while. Then, I run DESeq2 in R to carry out downstream analysis. But I have been reading for a long time the benefits of using salmon instead of htseq-count. Which one do you think is better for DESeq2 analysis?

Many thanks!

rna-seq salmon de htseq-count • 2.4k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.3 years ago by kristoffer.vittingseerup3.5k • written 3.3 years ago by Lila M 870
3
gravatar for kristoffer.vittingseerup
3.3 years ago by
European Union
kristoffer.vittingseerup3.5k wrote:

I would definitively go for Salmon (or Kallisto) for three reasons:

1) Isoform/transcript based quantification can handle multi-mapping reads - which otherwise gives a bias in genes with less unique sequences - see this post.

2) Isoform/transcript based quantification tools such as Salmon and Kallisto can perform quite advanced bias corrections meaning you will get rid of some confounding factors (see their respective papers).

3) Analysis of transcript/isoforms (such as isoform switches etc) is a growing field and seems to be quite important in some sitiuations - so why not also enable youself to do that. An option for this could be my tool IsoformSwitchAnalyzeR

P.s. remember to use the tximport R package to import the Kallisto/Salmon with the offset option to pass on the bias corrections to your de analysis.

/Kristoffer

ADD COMMENTlink modified 3.3 years ago • written 3.3 years ago by kristoffer.vittingseerup3.5k

Thank you for this fantastic answer, very informative!

ADD REPLYlink modified 3.3 years ago • written 3.3 years ago by Lila M 870
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1605 users visited in the last hour
_