Question: Can we concatenate two fastq files from same sample but different runs
0
gravatar for Payal
4 weeks ago by
Payal30
Payal30 wrote:

Hi,

I have two paired end file sets for a sample.

Forward: sample_R1_001.fastq.gz, sample_R1_002.fastq.gz

Reverse sample_R2_001.fastq.gz, sample_R2_002.fastq.gz

This is not a multilane case. They were two separate runs from the same sample aliquot!!

  1. Should I concat R1_001 and R1_002 fastq files ?
    1. Or should I run them as two separate pipelines?
    2. Or should I run them separately till alignment and then do BAM merge like for multilane samples?

Thanks, Payal

sequencing rna-seq • 172 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 4 weeks ago • written 4 weeks ago by Payal30

Whether a separate run or separate lane makes little difference, they are still technical replicates. They should not be merged.

ADD REPLYlink written 4 weeks ago by YaGalbi1.3k
2

s/should not be/should be/

ADD REPLYlink written 4 weeks ago by Devon Ryan81k
1

Whether a separate run or separate lane makes little difference, they are still technical replicates. They should not be merged.

I have not seen any lane practical lane effects. Illumina offers a --no-lane-splitting option for their post processing software (bcl2fastq) which will make a single file per sample, if the same pool ran across multiple lanes of a flowcell.

ADD REPLYlink modified 4 weeks ago • written 4 weeks ago by genomax51k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1462 users visited in the last hour