Question: Can we concatenate two fastq files from same sample but different runs
0
gravatar for Payal
2.4 years ago by
Payal100
Payal100 wrote:

Hi,

I have two paired end file sets for a sample.

Forward: sample_R1_001.fastq.gz, sample_R1_002.fastq.gz

Reverse sample_R2_001.fastq.gz, sample_R2_002.fastq.gz

This is not a multilane case. They were two separate runs from the same sample aliquot!!

  1. Should I concat R1_001 and R1_002 fastq files ?
    1. Or should I run them as two separate pipelines?
    2. Or should I run them separately till alignment and then do BAM merge like for multilane samples?

Thanks, Payal

sequencing rna-seq • 2.3k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 17 months ago by anamaria30 • written 2.4 years ago by Payal100
1

Whether a separate run or separate lane makes little difference, they are still technical replicates. They should not be merged.

ADD REPLYlink written 2.4 years ago by YaGalbi1.5k
4

s/should not be/should be/

ADD REPLYlink written 2.4 years ago by Devon Ryan97k

But is this the case also for variant calling? I remember in GATK they take care for lane in their analysis (case of de-multiplexed).

However, if you are generating multiple libraries for each sample, and/or multiplexing samples within and/or across sequencing lanes, the data must be de-multiplexed before pre-processing, typically resulting in multiple sets of FASTQ files per sample all of which should have distinct read group IDs (RGID).

ADD REPLYlink modified 2.3 years ago • written 2.3 years ago by Medhat8.8k

There are no appreciable lane effects any more so they have nothing to adjust.

ADD REPLYlink written 2.3 years ago by Devon Ryan97k
1

Whether a separate run or separate lane makes little difference, they are still technical replicates. They should not be merged.

I have not seen any lane practical lane effects. Illumina offers a --no-lane-splitting option for their post processing software (bcl2fastq) which will make a single file per sample, if the same pool ran across multiple lanes of a flowcell.

ADD REPLYlink modified 2.4 years ago • written 2.4 years ago by genomax92k
0
gravatar for anamaria
17 months ago by
anamaria30
anamaria30 wrote:

If I am not wrong, --no-lane-splitting is only available for bcl2fastq2, not for the bcl2fastq.

ADD COMMENTlink modified 17 months ago • written 17 months ago by anamaria30
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1302 users visited in the last hour