Question: CNV and pseudogenes
0
gravatar for Nandini
6 months ago by
Nandini760
London
Nandini760 wrote:

Hello,

I'm using ExomeDepth to detect CNVs and I'm providing a bed file for all our targeted gene panels.

We know there is a processed pseudogene in a region, am just wondering if this would confound CNV calling in other genes? If it knocks off the ‘average’ coverage ?

Is it worth excluding such regions ?

Thank you,

exomedepth cnv ngs pseudogenes • 281 views
ADD COMMENTlink written 6 months ago by Nandini760

I think it's depends on your reads length and the size of homology you have between your gene and pseudogene. If you have NGS you tank load the data and look manually with IGV for example.

ADD REPLYlink written 6 months ago by Titus770

Even if you did exclude the region for the analysis, how could you even be sure that the original reads themselves did not derive [in part] from the pseudogene.

Unfortunately, some regions of the genome are impossible to be faithfully analysed by short read NGS technology. If your group is studying a particular gene of interest, I would suggest a non-NGS protocol for the purpose of studying it, or at least a targeted NGS protocol where you know that the primers are targeting unique sequence around your genes of interest.

ADD REPLYlink modified 6 months ago • written 6 months ago by Kevin Blighe39k

True, I agree but we are more in a clinical setting than research so its generating data per panels.. i guess it's just finding an appropriate way of deal with this in a diagnostic environment

ADD REPLYlink written 6 months ago by Nandini760

If it's a clinical setting, then you even more need to ensure the fidelity of the test. I would not trust any NGS exome copy number tool for use in a clinical test. PCR or some other technique is the way to go. Just my opinion, though, having worked in this area.

ADD REPLYlink written 6 months ago by Kevin Blighe39k

of course, we MLPA everything before reporting but also trying to build a reliable bioinformatics pipeline

ADD REPLYlink written 6 months ago by Nandini760

What was your choice, in the end?

ADD REPLYlink written 6 months ago by Kevin Blighe39k
1

well we are still doing MLPA. Cannot rely on an invalidated CNV pipeline

ADD REPLYlink written 5 months ago by Nandini760
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 2198 users visited in the last hour