Hi, I'm using CNVkit to detect copy number alterations in hybridized capture panel. When I've used the same sample (exactly the same bam) as a reference I somehow do find some CNA. We used the batch command followed by the call command with default parameters (and with dropping low-coverage). 15 out of the 75 segments were found to have copy-number alteration (cn!=2). The cnn files are exactly the same both for the on- and off-targets so the problem starts when creating the cnr. Any idea why this discrepancy happens?
Question: CNVkit- weird results when using the same sample as normal
6 months ago by
biobiu • 110
biobiu • 110 wrote:
ADD COMMENT • link •
Please log in to add an answer.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1698 users visited in the last hour