Question: module membership (kME) versus NES (normalized enrichment score) from GSEA
gravatar for anamaria
18 months ago by
anamaria110 wrote:


I would like to reproduce fig 4A for my data from this paper: In Supplemental Materials in GWAS Enrichment section they say: "To quantify enrichment of GWAS signal within eachgene co-expression module, we calculated Spearman’s correlation between the module membership (kME) of each gene and the –log10p-value for that gene for each GWAS study. kME is a measure between 0 and 1 of the centrality of a gene within a module; “hub genes” have kME values approaching 1, whereas genes that are not present in a module generally have kME less than 0.5. This process was performed for all module x GWAS combinations, and p values were FDR-corrected."

I did run GSEA analysis and I am wondering is enrichment score from GSEA a reasonable substitute the module membership (kME)?

I can tell you a little bit more about what I am trying to do. So the hypothesis is: Cases versus Controls GSEA pathways are enriched for genes that harbor variants implicated through genetic association Subjects: our meta-GWAS Experiment is: Assess for pathway enrichment from meta-GWAS - do a pathways-based analysis looking for enrichment between the meta-GWAS and the gene expression chip-based data of the transcriptomes cases v controls.

If something obvious is here and can be implemented in analysis design and related to teh above mentioned graph please advise.

Thank you in advance!

gsea • 645 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 18 months ago • written 18 months ago by anamaria110
Please log in to add an answer.


Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 2111 users visited in the last hour