Closed:Should all microbiome analysis be done after normalization?
0
0
Entering edit mode
3.4 years ago
ariel ▴ 220

The way I understand things, normalization (such as in DeSeq2, EdgeR, etc.) serves two purposes: 1) Model the "real" abundance in the original samples from the read counts, 2) Make the abundance distributions conform to the needs of statistical analysis by removing heteroskedasticity, dependence, dispersion, etc.

It has been stated many times here that it is very difficult to reproduce the fold-change you get from DeSeq2 by extracting the normalized counts, but you can come close. Taken at face semantic value, "fold change" sounds like it should refer to the ratio of the "real" abundance; the fold change of "actual" expression or "actual" community representation.

So if the normalized (or normalized + VST, or normalized + MLE) abundance better represents the "real" abundance, then shouldn't I use the normalized counts for ALL of my analysis steps:

  • Alpha diversity
  • Beta diversity
  • F2B ratio
  • IgA sorting analysis
  • Other regression analysis
  • etc.
RNA-Seq • 238 views
ADD COMMENT
This thread is not open. No new answers may be added
Traffic: 1659 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6