Forum:Is trimming always better?
3
2
Entering edit mode
2.4 years ago
Mozart ▴ 280

Hello there, it may sound naive but sometimes people I know tend to avoid trimming step (i.e. using Trimmomatic) when

  1. the software which convert raw BCL data manages to remove adapters and
  2. alignment rate is more than 50%

what you think?

thanks

RNA-Seq trimming QC trimmomatic Forum • 824 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

sorry for resurrecting this old post but I would like to clarify a couple of things here.

I am trying to avoid trimming step also because when I look at the untrimmed fastq files there is no adapter contamination and Sequence Quality Histograms returned green check for all the fastq files.

percentage of pseudo alignment is between 82-85%. What do you recommend?

thanks

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

If you think results look reasonable you don't have to trim as @Devon already indicated (as long as you are not working with smallRNA, which you are not).

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks a lot for clarifying this @genomax. I will keep this in mind for future experiments.

ADD REPLY
5
Entering edit mode
2.4 years ago

I rarely trim RNA-seq data, since the aligners will just soft-clip adapters anyway.

Note that (1) will just trim adapters, so if you have quality issues that are actually affecting alignment then you'd still need to trim. With (2), 50% alignment is VERY low. I start to wonder if alignment is <90% (at least with common model organisms).

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

I see, thanks for clarifying this point.

ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode
19 months ago

Another anecdote...my lab does Lexogen RNA-Seq preps, I align with STAR, then I use RSEM to count reads assigned to genes.

What I observed is that Lexogen preps, which seem to involve a poly-T, sometimes generate reads with poly-A ends at the ends. This is fine for STAR, it doesn't mind soft-clipping, but the transcriptome alignment file it prepares that I use as input into RSEM can't handle soft-clipping, so those reads ended up dropped from the transcriptome alignment file, so RSEM of course could not count them. So I always trim poly-A's from the end of RNASeq read, to help them end up in the RSEM-friendly transcription file.

ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
2.4 years ago
GenoMax 109k

If you are working with smallRNA data then you will almost certainly have to trim your data. There may be kit specific adapters/procedures to deal with. A small number of bases left over (even if you use bcl2fastqv2 to trim data). bbduk.sh from BBMap suite will remove those by doing a trim by overlap.

When alignment falls below a reasonable it is time to grab a few non-aligning reads and head to blast.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1614 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6