Forum:How to Fairly Represent and Interpret Direct-To-Consumer Ancestry Results?
0
2
Entering edit mode
4.2 years ago

For my own ancestry results, I would say that the broad-level assignments (like the 1000 Genomes super-populations) were accurate but I had some concerns about some more specific predictions and smaller segments.

I have already gotten some useful feedback from the community through various means (even though some of those are for other topics). However, I wanted to make sure I was providing a fair mix of potential utility as well as limitations.

I expect that there are probably some general ideas about ancestry / race / ethnicity that may be important to communicate to the general public. For example, I think some Twitter threads from others match my feelings (such as this and this). However, I also thought that perhaps it might help if this discussion could relate to some more specific examples.

So, in terms of some specifics for my own results:

  • On the positive side, I found slightly more distant relatives (second cousin or closer) whose relationship I could confirm by talking to other relatives (although I would also say “relatedness” is a little different than “ancestry”). However, I feel differently about those that are closer than a 4th cousin versus more distant cousins.
  • I have approximately 2% African ancestry predicted from my father’s side. So, I think there should probably be a larger segment on one copy of my chr14. However, with RFMix, the African (AFR) ancestry was split between copies in nearby locations, which I would guess was due to phasing issues:

Genes for Good RFMix Re-Analysis

  • Also, as mentioned in the first blog post, I noticed that I could filter some likely false positive results on 23andMe if I increased the confidence threshold from 50% to 90%. Do you agree with the troubleshooting strategies that I discuss in that post, or do you have other suggestions about what somebody can do to critically assess a surprising result?
  • For example, have you found it useful to re-analyze raw results with tools like GEDmatch, impute.me, DNA.land, GENOtation, MySeq, etc.?

While I would like to keep discussion as public as possible, I did encounter at least one individual that shared at least one significant segment (identified through GEDmatch) where I didn’t really want to give out the information that might help interpret that signal. So, it is possible that I might wish to switch some conversations to more private communication (like e-mail or a Twitter Direct Message), but I will try to maximize what I answer publicly.

Do others have examples of either successful confirmation or false positives in their own results?

Thank you in advance for your feedback!

Ancestry chromosome-painting ADMIXTURE • 1.0k views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2719 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6