Question: ACMG 59 genes
0
gravatar for karthick.n
4 months ago by
karthick.n10
karthick.n10 wrote:

Hi,

I am new to this bioinformatics and i have one doubt. Why we are only focusing 59 genes mentioned by ACMG for secondary or accidental findings? Why we are only reporting the variants in those 59 genes? Can anyone share me an article which can explain this? Or you guys also can answer if possible.

Thanks in advance!

Regards, Karthick

ADD COMMENTlink written 4 months ago by karthick.n10
4

see this article

ADD REPLYlink written 4 months ago by lakhujanivijay5.3k
2
gravatar for German.M.Demidov
4 months ago by
Tübingen
German.M.Demidov1.9k wrote:

Hey, ethical issues, you report only clear actionable variants since a patient may prefer not to know about unclear or unactionable variants

ADD COMMENTlink written 4 months ago by German.M.Demidov1.9k

Thanks a lot @German.M.Demidov !

ADD REPLYlink written 4 months ago by karthick.n10
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 2009 users visited in the last hour