Question: Rare Variants Study Using Next-Gen Sequencing Data
1
gravatar for michealsmith
6.6 years ago by
michealsmith740
michealsmith740 wrote:

I'm reading papers which develop approaches to look for rare variants, esp. since GWAS has failed to explain the "missing heritability". Surprisingly, though it's still far away from being able to afford whole-genome sequencing over large number of samples; there have been numerous statistics/approaches developed for rare variants using sequencing data.

Some of my readings are as follows:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18691683 (quite early and influential: combined multivariant and collapsing; that is first collapse those rare variants after bin them according to allele frequency; then apply multivariant-testing; to make use of the power of two approaches)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19214210 (kind of set a weigh for each rare variant according to frequency)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19810025 (use multiple regression model; phenotype dependent variable vs collapsing rare variant independent variable)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21521787 (more recently, calculate functional principal component analysis)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22262732 (more recently, take account sequencing quality)

Since large-scale sequencing data is not available, most of them just use simulation data or sequencing data around certain genes. I'm just wondering can anyone introduce any experience of using all these approaches? Which one may be the best? It's very confusing and scary to beginners.... Also, we can have some discussions about how to improve such approaches when it comes to sequencing data. For example, compared to SNP array those common variants, we need to seriously take account sequencing errors. (That's why the last two approaches come out)

variant • 1.7k views
ADD COMMENTlink written 6.6 years ago by michealsmith740
1

You should read this paper of Eric Lander http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/01/04/1119675109 Where the conclusion is that the "missing heritability" are overestimated. But I still think is very important use the new NGS data to study rare variants.

ADD REPLYlink written 6.6 years ago by Geparada1.3k

I was wondering if anyone recalls a paper that reviewed all of the major existing collapsing methods. I think it was published in Nature Reviews Genetics, but I've been unable to find it. Any help?

ADD REPLYlink written 5.9 years ago by Ryan D3.3k
1

I guess you're referring to: "Statistical analysis strategies for association studies involving rare variants", http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v11/n11/full/nrg2867.html

ADD REPLYlink written 5.9 years ago by michealsmith740
1
gravatar for Zev.Kronenberg
6.6 years ago by
United States
Zev.Kronenberg11k wrote:

Try the VAAST tutorial. We have a rare variant hunt example starting from the raw variant files. Also the background CDR file that VAAST provides contains tons of variants to play with.

ADD COMMENTlink written 6.6 years ago by Zev.Kronenberg11k
1

Yeah, definitely. I've noticed VAAST even before your post.

ADD REPLYlink written 6.6 years ago by michealsmith740
1

Let us know if you have any questions.

ADD REPLYlink written 5.9 years ago by Zev.Kronenberg11k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1543 users visited in the last hour