Hi !!! I am working with WGS metagenome data profiled by MetaPhlAn software which gives relative abundance of taxa (no read count data of the taxa is provided). Now, I want to find out which are the significantly differentially present taxa between the test and the control samples with DESEQ package. So, my question is should I multiply the relative abundance data with some constant (e.g. 1 Million) converting the relative abundance to pseudo counts for Deseq analysis? Will it give correct result?