data values' transformation and P-value of Cox log rank test
0
0
Entering edit mode
14 months ago

Hi everyone,

I have done research on using single and integrative analyses on -omic datasets, including gene expression (EXP), copy number alteration (CNA), and methylation (MET), to classify breast cancer patients. Right now, I coded in R as well as drafted my manuscript already, and sent it out to my supervisor. The problem is that my supervisor asked me two questions, but truly I do not know how to answer well:

Summarizing clearly the used data: I used two data: discovery data and validation data, having the same characteristics as followings (AVAILABLE in the data description file):

  • EXP data are continuous variables using Z score transformation, range of values is between -6 and 11

  • CNA data are discrete variables generated using GISTIC or RAE algorithms range of values is between -2 and 2 (-2 = high deletion, -1 = deletion, 0 = copy-neutral, 1 = amplification, and 2 = high amplification)

  • MET data are discrete variables, range of values is between 0 and 1 (0 = hypo-methylated and 1 = hyper-methylated)

Below is my supervisor's questions:

1, Gene expression and methylation data are normalized?how? CNA data are defined gain and loss a threshold has been imposed?.

--> Because I did not normalize the used data at all, I do not know whether or not I should have done that (I googled and realized that maybe I should do log-transformation like log2 or log10) or the above existing characteristics are accepted to do my research?

2, Like I said, I performed single and integrative analyses on -omic datasets to stratify cancer patients. Then, both single and integrative analysis found two patient subgroups. I continued to implement survival analysis on those two groups, and the results are that P-value = 4E-04 and 1E-04 for single clustering on CNA and MET, respectively, and P-value = 0.002 for integrative clustering on EXP, CNA and MET. Then, My supervisor asked me:

Sub groups from single clustering analysis seems to have stronger relation with OS when compared to integrated clustering analysis (by comparing the p-vlaue, as the HR for single cluster analysis is not shown). What are the justification for this?

R P-value Cox transformation • 406 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2841 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6