PAML sample size question and variation in results
0
0
Entering edit mode
2.1 years ago
DNAngel ▴ 240

Hi all,

I posted my question in the PAML discussion group twice and haven't heard anything for months so hoping someone here can explain this to me:

I have a gene dataset with two partitions A and B, I separate the dataset into just A and just B to use for random-sites models to see if there's any pos selection happening in either dataset. Then I want to also see if there's divergent selection happening so I use CmC. What I notice is that with random-sites for like 40 genes I'm analyzing, there's more support for positive selection (i..e M2a vs. M1a is significant) for like 30 genes for partition A and only 15 for B.

However....in CmC analysis, all the genes are just showing purifying but divergent selection (even when significant, both partitions have dN/dS < 1). I am wondering if the random-sites models is affected more by sample size. Partition A had 40 species but partition B I only had data for 15 species. If this is indeed a discrepancy where more species = more variation detected in random-sites models, why would they appear so similar then in CmC when I use the combine dataset and label my partitions, with partition B set as the foreground.

Hope this made sense! Thank you!

PAML • 404 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1969 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6