Annotation tools (prokaryotes): prokka vs eggnog
Entering edit mode
2.3 years ago
willnotburn ▴ 50

Are there any obvious advantages/disadvantages to using one over the other? Both use HMM (I think), both are hierarchical (starting with EggNOG 4.5). Are they simply competitors? Perhaps there is a trade-off between database size (Prokka is smaller) and the quality of curation? I would appreciate any thoughts and/or pointers.

annotations HMM eggnog assembly prokka • 1.5k views
Entering edit mode
16 months ago
oschwengers ▴ 120

Prokka is a more comprehensive annotation pipeline in terms of not only annotating coding genes (CDS) but tRNAs, rRNAs, ncRNAs, CRISPR arrays. In contrast, EggNOG is specifically addressing the annotation of CDS only. As it has this focus and larger databases it is more sensitive in annotating rare CDS. However, by utilizing genus databases Prokka is able to annotate genus specific CDS by potential genus related terms.

So it depends on whether one is interested in CDS only or the entire genome. In that sense it's not quite fair to compare both. There other annotation tools like Prokka, e.g. PGAP, DFAST and Bakta.


Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1588 users visited in the last hour
Help About
Access RSS

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6