Question: Deciding on the best read length for metagenomics
0
gravatar for capfz200
6 weeks ago by
capfz2000
capfz2000 wrote:

Greetings,

Currently, I am performing a study on microbial diversity on low diversity environments, and I have some questions about the best platform to use. I am planning to use NovaSeq 6000 to sequence my metagenomic DNA, and I have two options: Paired End 150 and Paired End 250. I would like to know how much do I gain in metagenome assembly and gene detection with long inserts versus short when compared to losing a bit of accuracy in the R2?

sequencing next-gen assembly • 107 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 5 weeks ago by colindaven2.6k • written 6 weeks ago by capfz2000
0
gravatar for colindaven
5 weeks ago by
colindaven2.6k
Hannover Medical School
colindaven2.6k wrote:

It sounds like you want to do assembly after sequencing. In that case, always, always, always go for the longest read lengths you possibly can. It's not really a surprise than ONT and Pacbio HiFi and completely dominating the assembly realm, in metagenomics as well.

  • SE and PE 75bp are not great, except for alignment based metagenomics
  • You will definitely get better assemblies with 2x250bp.

How much better ? That's a tricky one, and dependent on your samples and their genomes, and how many close relatives they have. Perhaps you can go 2x250bp for a first run, subsample to 2x150bp and see if your assemblies are still useful.

ADD COMMENTlink written 5 weeks ago by colindaven2.6k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 953 users visited in the last hour
_