mauve alignment results meaning
0
0
Entering edit mode
9 months ago
langziv ▴ 20

Hi.

The alignment representation makes me think the 2 aligned genomes have no matching sequences, since I haven't seen such results when I searched for mauve results.

The alignment results image:

mauve-results

These two genomes are from 2 distinct samples that are of the same organism, so they are expected to have many matches.

mauve progressiveMauve • 518 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Is that an assembly? If memory serves, the red bars demarcate discontinuous boundaries between sequences.

That looks like a LOT of contigs - is this normal for your organism? If not, are you sure your assemblies are good?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for the reply.

It is an assembly. That's the amount of contigs we got after using programs such as cutadat, trimmomatic and bwa, among others. I don't know if it's normal or not. My PI seems ok with that. She's the experienced one in doing assemblies.

All the programs we used ran fine. There were no errors. Maybe there's something wrong about the raw data. We didn't do the sequencing part. We got it from another lab.

The results don't indicate about any similarities between the assemblies, right?

ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode

All the programs we used ran fine. There were no errors.

This does not mean that the results are reasonable or even correct. As @Joe said you have not mentioned an assembler yet. What is the size of this genome? Perhaps mauve is not the right program to use.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

The assembler we used was IDBA-UD. The genome size is about 1.4E9 (9 digits) bp. I read that the latest mauve version is suited for large genomes as well.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

That is a large genome. Based on results you are observing perhaps you should try something else. musgy (LINK) is an older tool that is recommended for this purpose. I found GS-ALIGN (LINK), MUMmer4 (LINK), SibeliaZ (LINK) seem to be recent options.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

Sorry for the silly question, but you actually ran the mauve/progressiveMauve algorithm after reading the sequences in to the software right?

If so, then yes, that indicates little to no similarity as far as I can tell. If you are confident in the assembly process (though you haven't actually mentioned an assembler, so I would double check this too), then the raw reads are probably at issue which has led to a poor assembly.

You may want to screen the reads and make sure there is little to no contamination and that the library quality is decent.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1648 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6