Cox regression on Splicing. PSI in 0 to 1 or 0 to 100 range
0
0
Entering edit mode
7 months ago

Hello,

I have a question on Cox regression using PSI (Percent Spliced In) values as covariates. In all publications I read the authors used PSI values between 0 and 1. However, I am not sure whether a multiplication by 100 would not make more sense regarding the interpretation of the Harzard ratios.

Here are some example results for a univariate cox regression using R. My formula is Surv(times, vital_status)~PSI, where PSI is a continuous variable. I used my normal PSI values (between 0 and 1) and once multiplied them by 100. Here are the results:

PSI between 0 and 1:

     coef      exp(coef)  se(coef)  z       Pr(>|z|)  
PSI -1.2900    0.2753     0.6131   -2.104   0.0354 *

PSI between 0 and 100

     coef        exp(coef)  se(coef)   z        Pr(>|z|)  
PSI -0.012900    0.987183   0.006131   -2.104   0.0354 *

The coef and se(coef) differ by a factor of 100, while z and the P-value are identical. exp(coef), so the Hazard ratio (HR) obviously differs and I am not sure, which one makes more sense in the interpretation.

As far as I understand it, the HR means that with each 1 unit change, the hazard/risk drops by 1-0.2753= 72.47% (range 0 to 1) and 1-0.987183=1.2817% (range 0 to 100), respectively. A one unit change for the 0 to 1 range means a change of 100% (e.g. going from no inclusion to full inclusion), while for the 0 to 100 range it is 1%. So for me it would make sense to use PSI values between 0 and 100 as the interpretation of the Hazard ratio makes much more sense.

However, all publications I found use a range of 0 to 1, which is why their HRs are very high or very close to 0.

What do you guys think?

Thanks in advance.

Mario

cox RNA-Seq • 242 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2749 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6