This question is rather general than specific. Hope, it's not too broad. I think a specific example is not required here.
I came up with this question a couple of month ago when analysing an Affymetrix microarray set of 16 cell lines. A colleague recommended me using MAS5 rather than RMA, because "it's more often used nowadays". Thus, I used MAS5 and not RMA.
However, I'm interested in a better reason for my choice (or mis-choice).
Where are the basic and important differences between MAS5 and RMA?
Are there (famous) examples, which show the advantages of the one over the other? Meaning, are there some general scenarios, where one should prefer the one over the other?
Thanks for your answers.
And MAS5 will return Present/Marginal/Absent flags on the data which can be used for filtering. I remember GeneSpring (now part of Agilent) saying that RMA/GCRMA produces less false positives on spike-in test data.
Thank you for this summary. I've got plenty to read now :)
Right; the observation that spike-in probes behave comparably across chips in one experiment is the justification for the multi-chip model.
@Daniel Thank you for this detail. The present/marginal/absent calls were the main point I needed during my work back then and probably another reason for my colleague recommending me MAS5.