Command-Line Tool For Swapping Amino Acid Side-Chain Rotamers
3
4
Entering edit mode
13.4 years ago

Does anyone know of a command-line (non-GUI) tool like SCWRL that will optimize the side-chains of a protein structure, but allow you to somehow specify that you want not the most optimal rotamer, but rather the 2nd or 3rd or 4th most optimal rotamer? My system is a static system, but I need to look at the effects of changing a rotamer in several hundred proteins.

I know this can be done in Chimera, it will give you a list of rotamers and their frequency, but I need a command-line tool since it will be part of a larger script that will be used on 100s of files (so I can't just do it manually).

protein modeling structure protein • 4.9k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

What do you mean by "rotamer" here from the perspective of protein structures ? Is it same as per the definition here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conformational_isomerism ? If your answer is YES, my answer is valid. You can generate conformers using CRANKITE.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Yes, I am using the same definition of "rotamer," but no, your answer is not valid because I used the word "optimal" several times and cited SCWRL and Chimera to make it clear that I am not looking for random sampling (CRANKITE), I am looking for "optimal"/frequent rotamers (SCWRL/Rotamer libraries).

Please read this section of the page you cited: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conformational_isomerism#Protein_rotamer_libraries

ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode
13.4 years ago
Woa ★ 2.9k

Most probably it can be done by EGAD a protein design tool, that runs in unix/linux from command line.

I found it a bit difficult to learn and use for protein designing purpose, and finally abandoned it in favor of some other utility at it keeps on crashing for a particular type of protein complex. I hope a simple functionality like single amino acid rotamer optimization would run flawlessly. Have a quick glance at the manual HERE

ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

Very difficult! Such a complicated interface and documentation. But I did get this to work. Thanks!

ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode
12.7 years ago

Since I asked this question I found a useful tool on the PyMOL wiki called Rotamer Toggle. It uses the Dunbrack rotamer library. It may not be the most user-friendly, but I think it's a good programmatic way to handle this problem.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
13.4 years ago

Yes. Check CRANKITE.
Package is available here

EDIT: from manuscript peptide

The Metropolis polypeptide backbone conformation sampler. A very short simulation can be run by using a command like

./peptide -r 1000x25 -t 201 d1ctf__.pdb

This will read the initial conformation from file d1ctf__.pdb, perform 25,000 Metropolis moves, while recording a contact map and a snapshot conformation every 1000 steps. The output will have 25 contact maps and 25 snapshots. To get help with more options, use "./peptide -h".

These 25 snapshots will contain different rotamers / conformers you are looking for.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

I read the Crankite SCFBM page (1st link you gave) and also looked through the readme for Crankite, and I do not see how I could use it to change just one particular side-chain rotamer. The documentation never even mentions the words "rotamer." Let me know if I'm missing something. Maybe you know of an undocumented feature.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I didn't noticed that the user not used the term 'rotamer'. The paper is about a library for conformational sampling, which is AFAIK same as the rotamers. From the perspective of protein structures rotamers = conformations. CRANKITE is a library to generate conformers. Use the option I have added to the answer not just "2nd or 3rd or 4th most optimal rotamer" you can generate 25 conformers.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you for trying to help, Khader, but I only want to change a side-chain, and only to the next most optimal/frequent/common rotamer. The CRANKITE tool looks good for conformational sampling, but I am not looking for sampling.

To clarify the difference: the command you provided will generate 25 protein conformations, but 1) they will not be ordered according to side-chain frequency and 2) the whole structure and backbone will be different. Technically, I could just run a very long CRANKITE simulation, but then I would have to cluster and sort the snapshots to get the optimal side-chains.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I was in a impression that conformation sampling could be a way to find next optimatal rotamer. I agree with your points if you are specifically looking for specific side-chain rotamers, CRANKITE may not be an ideal option. I am not deleting the answer, hope the discussion will be useful for future reference.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2160 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6