I recently came across this situation when parsing the whole Uniprot Sprot and Trembl xml files.
There are some cases where references to RefSeq in Uniprot entries are not included in RefSeq complete release. After looking for some of the problematic references (randomly selected), it looks like they are all provisional records; but then, my question is:
Why are they included as a reference?
Does any of you have more information about this?
Here you have some of the problematic references: (I could provide the full list if anyone may find it useful)
Q8D8G9 , NC_004459.3
P25445 , NM_152871.2
P09470 , NM_009598.2
Q0VAN4 , NM_181435.5
Q8DD16 , NC_004459.3
Q8D4H5 , NC_004460.2
Hi jerven, I already did that, however I still think it's also a good idea asking it here. That way, much more people can benefit from the answer as well as provide the solution in case they already ran into similar situations. Cheers,
Of course feel free to add the reply to the page and mark it as answered.
Of course feel free to add the answer they give to this page yourself. And mark it as an correct answer. Cheers.
Yeah, I'll do that as soon as I get the answer. Cheers.