It depends on what you mean by assess the reliability of the tree. It also highly depends on the type of phylogenetic analysis you are doing. Are you doing single-gene phylogenies? How many taxa are in your dataset? Multi-gene phylogenies? Are you interested in the phylogenetics for speciation or are you trying to infer something about the protein or gene in question? In general to get answers about support of your phylogenetic tree when trying to answer questions about the organisms in it you should:
1) Be doing multi-gene phylogenies. Single genes can have different evolutionary patterns than the species they are contained in for a variety of reasons. You should also be doing broad taxon sampling
2) Be doing Maximum-Likelihood or Bayesian phylogenetica, and not Neighbour-Joining. They are both more robust inferences
3) Model selection may be important for your particular gene(s) of interest. ModelTest is useful.
4) Ideally do more than one type of tree reconstruction (both Likelihood and Bayesian)
5) AIC tests or similar are also good ways to test how well your phylogeny holds up compared to an alternative reconstruction.
But again, the exact type of phylogenetic experiment you are doing, and the question you are trying to answer, are very important when considering how to validate how supported your phylogeny is.
6.3 years ago by
DG ♦ 7.1k