Question: How The Non-Canonical Intron Splice Sites Came Out?
0
gravatar for bill-zt
5.1 years ago by
bill-zt40
bill-zt40 wrote:

The canonical intron splicing sites should be GT-AG, GC-AG and AT-AC, while other non-canonical splicing sites are mostly annotation errors.

However I still find some non-canonical splicing cases that have good transcriptome support. For example, the fourth intron in ENSMUST00000003725 in mouse (Could be found in Ensembl 65) is non-canonical (GT-CA, perhaps shift by 1 base when annotation), however in UCSC genome browser I find three mRNA sequences that support it (AB0112265, AK166423, BC021426).

How this intron was spliced out?

intron • 3.4k views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 2.2 years ago by Biostar ♦♦ 20 • written 5.1 years ago by bill-zt40
1
gravatar for Geparada
4.5 years ago by
Geparada1.4k
Cambridge
Geparada1.4k wrote:

To try to answer this question we did a comprehensive analysis of non-canonical splice sites present at the human transcriptome. Our analysis is currently published in NAR (http://bit.ly/1t2FBZY)

Cheers,

ADD COMMENTlink modified 4.5 years ago • written 4.5 years ago by Geparada1.4k

I appreciate your kind comment, but the url you gave was out of service now, would you like to send me straightly the title of your paper or the doi as the best ?

ADD REPLYlink written 4 weeks ago by ytzhao0

"A comprehensive survey of non-canonical splice sites in the human transcriptome" If you have any questions let me know.

ADD REPLYlink written 29 days ago by Geparada1.4k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 2.3.0
Traffic: 1408 users visited in the last hour