Using outgroup in gene family dendograms
1
2
Entering edit mode
3.0 years ago

Greetings!

I'm currently trying to find candidate genes related to a certain pathway of my species of interest. My approach began by screening certain gene families after performing DGE on some datasets. After obtaining my initial candidates I want to compare them with other genes (from the same family) involved in similar reaction/roles.

My question is regarding the use of an outgroup sequence in this analysis. My understanding is that an outgroup should be a sequence (or sequences) that are outside the group of interest and more distantly related to the ingroup. So, since I'm studying a gene family and not orthologs genes I'm not sure If I should include a sequence from the same family but outside my taxa. Does this make sense and is there anything I should take into consideration while analysing my results?

Thanks in advance

mega dendograms • 1.6k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
3.0 years ago
Mensur Dlakic ★ 27k

Your understanding is correct. Let's say that you are studying proteins from thermophilic bacteria, in which case a related protein from E. coli would almost certainly form an outgroup. If you study archaeal proteins, a matching group of relatives from bacteria would create an outgroup. How distant outgroup proteins should be depends on your goal. They can be from the same kingdom but different orders, or different phyla. If your aim is broader, they can be from different kingdoms. There is no prescribed rule how to select an outgroup.

Also, keep in mind that it is not a requirement to include an outgroup.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

What If I want to compare my candidates genes (for example from ABC family) with sequences from other species? Should I include an outgroup and do I go about it?

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

It is difficult to answer your questions any better than I already have given the vague information you provided.

If you are talking about ABC transporters, that is a big superfamily of proteins. Even if you were to make a tree of all ABC transporters from a single species, you would have outliers in it because the superfamily is very diverse. As to if you should be including other species, I don't know what you have already, nor do I know what you are trying to achieve.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Wouldn't a gene that isn't an ABC superfamily member from some distant species suffice as an outgroup candidate here?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Wouldn't a gene that isn't an ABC superfamily member from some distant species suffice as an outgroup candidate here?

Most definitely no. It goes without saying that a random protein from a different species (or even the same species) would be an outlier. The goal is to select a protein that is distantly related but belongs to a group. In other words, it should be a protein (or a group of proteins) that can be aligned to others.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thank for the fast reponse. The ABC family is not the best example for this question indeed. The objective of my work is to find genes responsible for transport of secundary compounds. Hence I'm doing dendograms using a) my candidate genes protein sequences, b) the protein sequences of genes from that family that are already caracterized as transporters of secundary compounds and c) all the protein sequences from that family in arabidopsis.

I was on the fence of including outgroup in this analysis, as what I'm really looking for is if the genes from my species cluster with with other genes from b)

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2976 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6