CNVkit methods and parameters
1
0
Entering edit mode
2.9 years ago
ICfc97 ▴ 20

Hi!

I've been trying CNVkit to detect CNVs in WGS data in the sample NA12878 with coverage of 5x, so I have tried the "Whole-genome sequencing and targeted amplicon capture" varying the target size and also the algorithm which is used for segmentation".

cnvkit.py batch output_bam -n -m wgs --segment-method flasso -f GRCh37.p13 --target-avg-size 6000 --scatter --diagram -d 

As a result, I obtained, a .cns file in which the ranges are followed so the variants are one after the other and that doesn't make sense. Has anyone tried these method and know which parameters work better? Thanks in advance!

WGS CNV analysis • 941 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
2.8 years ago
wanziyi89 ▴ 60

It might be because you used -n instead of providing a normal sample bam file with the -normal normal.bam. -n uses a flatbed of coverage instead of coverage which is expected with your assay (e.g. your set of hybrid capture probes.).

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2476 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6