KING struggle: Relatedness
0
0
Entering edit mode
2.7 years ago

I struggle to infer relationships in a dataset of 20K exomes from tens of kits.

At first I found a well-covered union of regions - check.

Second, I performed everything to merge 20K VCFs into one. Removed indels and multi-allelic variants. Check.

Still, when I run KING with "kinship" option, it finds a lot of relatives. But I need KING with --related option. With IBD2 and IBD1. And here I get 0 first degree and 0 second degree relatives (still some MZ pairs).

Which basically says that I can't infer IBD-segments and it is (I think) due to QC failed samples.

Is there a procedure for an automated QC here? Or I need to make a PCA and do "remove outliers - build PCA again - remove outliers - iterate until no outliers" procedure? Is there any other reason why KING may behave so nasty with me?

Some data to give an idea (toy dataset of 3K exomes):

King with --related:

Source        MZ      PO      FS      2nd     3rd     OTHER
  ===========================================================
  Pedigree      0       0       0       0       0       5512860
  Inference     30      0       0       3       8       5512819

King with --kinship:

  Source        MZ      PO      FS      2nd     3rd     OTHER
  ===========================================================
  Pedigree      0       0       0       0       0       5512860
  Inference     30      58      463     19      895     5511395

I was able to perform relatedness inference with 10K dataset (subset of this one) 1 year ago. I have no idea what is different now (except now no one filtered QC failed samples) - I simply execute the same makefile.

king relatedness • 628 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2577 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6