featureCounts parameters
0
0
Entering edit mode
7 months ago
Lucy ▴ 100

Hi,

I was wondering whether you would recommend adjusting the following featureCounts parameters and if so, why?

--fracOverlap, --fracOverlapFeature, --minOverlap, --maxMOp

I am trying to decide which parameters to go for. I have high quality bulk RNA-seq data (75 bp or 150 bp paired-end reads) from humans and I have mapped the data with STAR. Please let me know if you require any other information.

Best wishes,

Lucy

RNA-seq featureCounts RNA-Seq • 847 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Are you doing a Differential Expression analysis? If so, are you interested in a Gene Differential Expression or Transcript Differential Expression?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Please use comments to reply, instead of answers. Other info:

  • How's your read length distribution?
  • Which is the experimental design? Is there something which may benefit from accounting multimapping reads (considering a PE experiment)?
  • Tools like FeatureCounts or HtSeq were replaced for more accurate ones like Kallisto or Salmon. Why not using them?
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Hi Shred,

I haven't actually seen any convincing evidence that Kallisto and Salmon are more accurate than tools like featureCounts. Please supply the references.

My read lengths are 75 bp or 150 bp paired-end (and I have done a small amount of trimming). I will run featureCounts twice, once excluding multi-mapping reads and once counting them fractionally.

Best wishes,

Lucy

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

Salmon is better suited for transcript-level redistribution of reads. Featurecounts was not designed to distinguish between transcripts.

Note how Salmon is not a replacement of Featurecounts but a replacement of an entire two-step process: alignment+counting

When it comes to finding coverages at the gene level, the differences between the classification methods of Salmon vs the alignments +counting are probably less pronounced. Though running Salmon is probably much faster and simpler.

The main downside of Salmon is that you are not getting a genome level alignment that you could visualize, thus I always recommend doing both types of analyses and comparing the results.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Salmon could be used to quantify .bam files aligned against the transcriptome fasta file, which, for the purpose of a DE analysis with human RNAseq data, may be enough.

ADD REPLY
0
0
Entering edit mode

Yes I will be doing gene level differential expression analysis.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 998 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6